Class 3 Error Reports – CivilFEM powered by Marc
The CivilFEM error classification system consists of three classes. Class 1 errors are those that do not affect the software functionality (such as text issues or minor bugs). Class 2 errors are those that prevent the correct use of the program (crashes, unhandled exceptions, non-functional buttons, or other similar issues). Class 3 errors are those where the program appears to work correctly but returns incorrect calculation results that could go unnoticed. Therefore, Class 3 errors are reported and their fixes are published to help users track and verify them when using CivilFEM in real engineering cases.
| Document | Description |
|---|---|
| 📄SD2024003_CFM-241.pdf | Description of Error: When solving a model with initial stresses (using TXT file) in conjunction with a material defined with crack data and softening modulus specified in a table, the variable softening modulus is ignored. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Avoid the use of initial stress by TXT file. For example, use the reset displacement option. Comments: N/A X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: Hugo González 09/12/2024 27/01/2025 X Reviewed... |
| 📄SD2024002_CFM-202.pdf | Description of Error: In some cases there is an error while transforming the solid stress tensor to the solid section coordinate system. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Use the same coordinate system for the solid structural element and the solid section Comments: N/A X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: Hugo González 23/07/2024 06/11/2024 X Reviewed by Firmado por: Israel Cabañas 30/07/2024 FM–12001 – Rev.: 04 Abril 2017 |
| 📄SD2024001_CFM-199.pdf | Description of Error: When gravity load is applied to a model with pyramid elements (hybrid mesh) in combination with beam elements, the equivalent external nodal force contributions of the pyramid elements are incorrect, resulting in incorrect loading of the model. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Do not use hybrid mesh if gravity load is applied and beam elements exists Comments: This was an error in Marc solver and correction is included in Marc 2024.1 X Corrected by ... |
| 📄SD2023001_CFM-128.pdf | Description of Error: User–defined Poisson ratio is incorrectly computed in the Hyperbolic material model Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: N/A Comments: N/A Firma no válida X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: Hugo González 21/03/2024 Firma no válida X Reviewed by Firmado por: Ronald Siat FM–12001 – Rev.: 04 Abril 2017 |
| 📄SD2022005_CFM-37.pdf | Description of Error: Alpha and Beta Rayleigh coefficients for damping are operated with incorrect units. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: If the automatic calculation of alpha and beta is selected, introduce the values required by CivilFEM (wmin and wmax) in the correct unit for international system (rad/s) and ignore the unit shown in the property (Hz). If alpha and beta are directly input, ignore the units shown in the property and put the value for the correct unit i... |
| 📄SD2022004_CFM-33.pdf | Description of Error: Incorrect results by operating two or more variables in user results window. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Perform the user result calculation with the Python commands instead using the user results window. Comments: N/A X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: Hugo González 23/12/2022 06/02/2023 X Reviewed by Firmado por: Alberto Mota 11/01/2023 FM–12001 – Rev.: 04 Abril 2017 |
| 📄SD2022003_CFM-22.pdf | Description of Error: Shear forces on concrete beams with shear effects could be wrong if exists other beams without shear effects activated. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Activate or deactivate the shear effects checkbox for all the concrete beams. Comments: N/A X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: Hugo González 02/11/2022 06/02/2023 X Reviewed by Firmado por: Alberto Mota 11/01/2023 FM–12001 – Rev.: 04 Abril 2017 |
| 📄SD2022002_D-03745.pdf | Description of Error: In a static non–linear analysis, the Acceleration load group (Gravity) is not correctly removed if it appears in a previous load case. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: If a static non–linear analysis has some load cases with gravity and others without gravity, the load cases with gravity should be defined with the latest calculation time to avoid this issue. Comments: N/A X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: Hugo González... |
| 📄SD2022001_D-03743.pdf | Description of Error: Error while transferring the prestress load group on nodes if the tendon geometry has the opposite direction to the beam. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Make sure the tendon geometry is defined in the same direction than the beam direction Comments: N/A X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: Hugo González 11/07/2022 12/07/2022 11/07/2022 X Reviewed by Firmado por: Luis Valdivia Montoro FM–12001 – Rev.: 04 Abril 2017 |
| 📄SD2021002_D-03702.pdf | Description of Error: Error in isostatic forces calculation of prestress load when the load group is added in a load case with different load groups factors. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Order the load groups of the load case in such a way that the first load corresponds to the prestress load group. Comments: The load group factor used to calculate the prestress isostatic forces is the factor of the first load case. X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval... |
| 📄SD2021001_D-03684.pdf | Description of Error: Transient loads that are deactivated in the subsequent load case are not correctly removed. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Define the end of the load in the load–time table when the load is not added in a subsequent load case. Comments: N/A X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: Hugo González 12/08/2021 07/09/2021 X Reviewed by Firmado por: Ronald Siat 07/09/2021 FM–12001 – Rev.: 04 Abril 2017 |
| 📄SD2020003_D-03628.pdf | Description of Error: Error when creep properties are defined in more than one concrete material Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: N/A Comments: N/A X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: Hugo González 22/12/2020 23/12/2020 22/12/2020 X Reviewed by Firmado por: Luis Valdivia Montoro FM–12001 – Rev.: 04 Abril 2017 |
| 📄SD2020002_D-03595.pdf | Description of Error: When breaking–glue or advanced contact condition is fulfilled, the touching properties could not be applied properly. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: The error happens when no other friction contacts exists in the model. So the workaround is define any touching contact with friction (even structural elements are not going to be close enough to contact) Comments: N/A X Corrected by Firmado por: Antonio Alonso X Approval Firmado por: Hugo González 25... |
| 📄SD2020001_D-03580.pdf | Description of Error: Bending class of cross sections according EC3 could be wrongly calculated. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: N/A Comments: The error occurs when exists plates in pure traction. 26/06/2020 29/06/2020 X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro 06/07/2020 X Reviewed by Firmado por: Luis Valdivia Montoro X Approval Firmado por: Hugo González FM–12001 – Rev.: 04 Abril 2017 |
| 📄SD2019006_D-03518.pdf | Description of Error: Error while mapping temperatures in coupled Thermal/Structural analysis when more than one structural load case is defined. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: N/A Comments: N/A X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: Hugo González 04/09/2019 16/09/2019 04/09/2019 X Reviewed by Firmado por: M Cruz Argüeso Chamorro FM–12001 – Rev.: 04 Abril 2017 |
| 📄SD2019005_D-03516.pdf | Description of Error: Error while transferring prestress load to nodal loads. Sometimes not all tendons are applied and if a large number of divisions for shell and solid prestress load is used the nodal forces are wrongly computed. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: N/A Comments: Review carefully the nodal loads applied to the model. X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: Hugo González 04/09/2019 16/09/2019 04/09/2019 X Reviewed by Firmado por: L... |
| 📄SD2019004_D-03511.pdf | Description of Error: Thermal/Seepage contact interaction properties are poorly applied when different properties exist. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Define the same Thermal/Seepage contact interaction properties for all the contacts. For example, if all contacts are glue type with the same tolerance it will be correct. Comments: This error does not occur in the Structural contacts interaction properties. This error only occurs for thermal or seepage analysis. 23/07/... |
| 📄SD2019003_D-03507.pdf | Description of Error: Error in contact bodies definition when one structural element is repeated in different lists of the contact structural elements. This error only occurs if the lists that contain the structural element repeated are not the same. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Define contacts in a way that the contacted list and contacting list of all contacts do not have the same structural elements. If it is required to have the same structural element with more ... |
| 📄SD2019002_D-03472.pdf | Description of Error: Error in the spectral analysis when deactivation of structural elements occurs in spectral load case. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: N/A Comments: N/A X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: Hugo González 04/07/2019 04/07/2019 X Reviewed by Firmado por: Alberto Mota 04/07/2019 FM–12001 – Rev.: 04 Abril 2017 |
| 📄SD2019001_D-03459.pdf | Description of Error: Losses due steel relaxation are wrongly computed according to Eurocode 2. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: N/A Comments: N/A X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: Javier Carro 06/05/2019 06/05/2019 06/05/2019 X Reviewed by Firmado por: Luis Valdivia Montoro FM–12001 – Rev.: 04 Abril 2017 |
| 📄SD2018005_D-03444.pdf | Description of Error: The cracking check results for beams are wrongly calculated if cracking plane selected is XZ and non–symmetric reinforcement is defined. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Change the orientation of beam to makes the code check for Mz moment. X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: José M. Moreno 28/11/2018 14/12/2018 X Reviewed by Firmado por: Alberto Mota 13/12/2018 FM–12001 – Rev.: 04 Abril 2017 |
| 📄SD2018004_D-03431.pdf | Description of Error: S.L.S Cracking. EC–02 for shells. There are an error when calculate Aceff (the effective area of concrete in tension surrounding the reinforcement or prestressing tendons of depth), hcef, where hcef is the lesser of these expressions: 2,5(h–d), (h–x)/3 or h/2. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: N/A. Comments: CivilFEM calculates hcef as the lesser of 2,5(h–d) or h/2. So when the neutral axis has to be taken into account hcef is wrong calculated. 22/11... |
| 📄SD2018003_D-03422.pdf | Description of Error: Error in calculated elastic critical moment for lateral–torsional buckling on uniform symmetrical cross–sections about the minor axis (Annex F, ENV 1993–1–1:1992). This error also affects the Indian code IS 800 2007. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Comments: Error occurs while calculating the integration of : X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: José M. Moreno 12/09/2018 18/09/2018 X Reviewed by Firmado por: Alberto Mota... |
| 📄SD2018002_D-03398.pdf | Description of Error: Envelope/Combination results will be incorrect if the elements table of the result file has the same size but different numbering order. This might happen if results file are obtained from a checking of selection elements and the selected elements to be checked are the same but has been selected with a different order Keywords: GUI Access: Post–processing –> Envelope/Combinations Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Ensure that the order of elements sel... |
| 📄SD2018001_D-03284.pdf | Description of the Error: Error in crack checking of beams with certain type of sections (captured, user defined) for EC2, ACI. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: N/A Comments: For a section to be affected, it must have its local axes not located on the COG of the section. Depending on the location of those axes, the distance between the COG and the origin was obtained incorrectly, leading to an erroneous result in a crack check by code. 14/02/2018 X Author Signature Firma... |
| 📄SD2017017_D-03317.pdf | Description of the Error: Surface film coefficients, ambient temperatures and emissivity applied on the top face of a shell (Flux on top face option) in a transient thermal or seepage analysis are not applied on the top face, but are actually applied on the bottom face of the shell. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Solve the model with the new version to obtain correct results. Comments: 19/12/2017 X Author Signature Firmado por: Javier Marcelo Mora 19/12/2017 X Developm... |
| 📄SD2017016_D-03316.pdf | Description of the Error: Surface film coefficients, ambient temperatures and emissivity applied on the top face of a shell in a steady state thermal or seepage analysis are not applied on the top face, but are actually applied on the bottom face of the shell. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Solve the model with the new version to obtain correct results. Comments: 19/12/2017 X Author Signature Firmado por: Javier Marcelo Mora 19/12/2017 X Development Manager Approval Fi... |
| 📄SD2017015_D-03311.pdf | Description of the Error: Surface fluxes applied on the top face of a shell (Flux on top face option) in a transient thermal or seepage analysis are not applied on the top face, but are actually applied on the bottom face of the shell. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Solve the model with the new version to obtain correct results. Comments: 18/12/2017 X Author Signature Firmado por: Javier Marcelo Mora 18/12/2017 X Development Manager Approval Firmado por: José M. Moreno... |
| 📄SD2017014_D-03310.pdf | Description of the Error: Surface fluxes applied on the top face of a shell (Flux on top face option) in a steady state thermal or seepage analysis are not applied on the top face, but are actually applied on the bottom face of the shell. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Solve the model with the new version to obtain correct results. Comments: 18/12/2017 X Author Signature Firmado por: Javier Marcelo Mora 18/12/2017 X Development Manager Approval Firmado por: José M. Mor... |
| 📄SD2017013_D-03275.pdf | Description of Error: Pressure gradient has not been imported properly from any analysis to transient analysis. The nodal load distribution is wrong if there are gradient pressures during importation process. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: N/A Comments: N/A X Corrected by Firmado por: José Luis Gómez X Approval Firmado por: José M. Moreno 03/10/2017 03/10/2017 03/10/2017 X Reviewed by Firmado por: M Cruz Argüeso Chamorro FM–12001 – Rev.: 04 Abril 2017 |
| 📄SD2017012_D-02204.pdf | Description of Error: The x–axis values in the history results are always in the international system although the title indicates that the units are in the units of the model. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Set the units of the model for the measure of x–axis in international system. Comments: Y–axis values are according with units of the model. X Corrected by Firmado por: Israel Cabañas X Approval Firmado por: José M. Moreno 24/05/2017 29/05/2017 X Reviewed by Firmad... |
| 📄SD2017011_D-02203.pdf | Description of the Error: Acceleration load imported in a transient analysis from a non–transient model is not taken into account if it is applied in any load case. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Instead of using the imported global acceleration, user must create a local acceleration load group applied to all structural elements. Comments: This error only occurs if the transient analysis is nonlinear. 29/05/2017 29/05/2017 X Author Signature Firmado por: Javier Carro 2... |
| 📄SD2017010_D-02202.pdf | Description of the Error: When saving a document in XCF format, the parameters of "Reinforced bars diameter" type with values in the default unit of the model, will not be properly restored after loading the XCF document. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Save in CF format, that works properly, or change the default unit of the parameter so the unit is shown in blue (custom unit). In those cases the value is properly restored. Comments: The default unit of the document is... |
| 📄SD2017009_D-02194.pdf | Description of Error: When operating with "Length" and "Reinforced bars diameter" parameters or with "Time" and "Age" parameters, those were considered independent units and no conversion to a consistent unit system was performed. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Do not operate in the same formula "Length" and "Reinforced bars diameter" parameters or "Time" and "Age" parameters, unless you specify the conversion to millimeters or days in the formula with a semicolon: ";m... |
| 📄SD2017008_D-02186.pdf | Description of the Error: The value of Vc and all results that depend on Vc (Vn, VFi, CRT) in ACI 318 14 for Shear check/design of shells was incorrectly calculated if lambda (lightweight concrete factor) was different than 1.0. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: The correct Vc result for shear check/design of shells under the ACI 318 14 can be obtained by dividing the given Vc by lambda. Comments: 26/04/2017 X Author Signature Firmado por: Javier Marcelo Mora 27/04/2017 X... |
| 📄SD2017007_D-02161.pdf | Description of the Error: Limiting value for effective axial stress in concrete 'cd is not correctly computed in EHE 2008 code for out of plane chek and design for shell elements. The following limitation values are not taken into account in the final value of effective axial stress: cd < 0.30 fcd 12 MPa (Compression positive) Besides, limiting value of 2 for is not taken into account as well: = 1 + 200, d in mm < 2 d Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: 'cd and values... |
| 📄SD2017006_D-02159.pdf | Description of the Error: Total shear reinforcement 1 in Out of Plane Shear Check and Design for Eurocode 2 and EHE 2008 standards is wrongly computed in shell elements. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: The correct total shear reinforcement 1 is computed from each x, y direction of the shell element, according to equation LL.123 (Annex LL from EN 1992–2:2005): 1 = x cos2v + y sin2v There is no suggested action. Comments: Total shear reinforcement 1 is taken into accoun... |
| 📄SD2017005_D-02140.pdf | Description of the Error: There is a problem with formulas working with inconsistent units. When the units of the model are inconsistent, CivilFEM has a mechanism that enables to work converting all values to a consistent unit system based on the principal units of the model, unless other units are specifies after a semicolon in the formula. In some cases the units after the semicolon do not work as expected. Keywords: formula, units, consistent GUI Access: any editable value that accepts a form... |
| 📄SD2017004_D-02131.pdf | Description of Error: Results for shell concrete cracking check might be incorrect depending on the name of the materials. In most cases, CivilFEM crashes, but in other cases can give incorrect results. Keywords: GUI Access: Results > Check shells > Cracking Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: If possible, check the model with only one concrete material and one reinforcement steel material. Comments: X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: José M. M... |
| 📄SD2017003_D-02114.pdf | Description of Error: Initial stresses from Marc results file are not taken into account in shell elements. In a model containing shells, the initial stress process wasn't taking the stresses defined on shells into account. Keywords: Initial stress, shell. GUI Access: Solve Tab, Initial State. Load a T16 initial state file, check Stress checkbox, solve. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: N/A Comments: N/A X Corrected by Firmado por: José Luis Gómez X Approval Firmado por: ... |
| 📄SD2017002_D-02107.pdf | Description of Error: Some units have been modified in reference to a conversion error: – The kp·mm/mm unit was providing a different value from real. – The MP/cm^2 unit was throwing a value in a lesser magnitude scale. – mH2O pressure unit has been changed from 9.80638E–3 to 9.80638E3. – Some moment per length units: kgf·cm/cm, kgf·mm/mm, tonf·cm/cm and tonf·mm/mm, returned: kgf·cm/m, kgf·mm/m, tonf·m/cm and tonf·mm/m values, respectively. Keywords: conversion, units GUI Access: Suggested User ... |
| 📄SD2017001_D-02103.pdf | Description of Error: Error in the input for the solver of the moment applied when the moment is applied on a node with a boundary condition or model util in a coordinate system different from the global cartesian in a non–static linear model. Keywords: GUI Access: [Load Group] –> Single Moment Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Comments: X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: José M. Moreno 03/02/2017 13/02/2017 X Reviewed by Firmado por: Alberto... |
| 📄SD2016014_D-02056.pdf | Description of the Error: In a transient analysis, the Solver parameter values for the alpha–generalized method, alpha_f and alpha_m were not taken into consideration, regardless of the entered value. Alpha_f was always given a value of 0.00 and alpha_m was always given a value of 1.00. Keywords: alpha–generalized, transient analysis, integration method GUI Access: After creating a transient analysis, Solve tab, Configure button, alpha–m and alpha–f Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrect... |
| 📄SD2016013_D-02051.pdf | Description of the Error: When performing a Shear or Torsion check using the ACI349–06 standard, the value for the Phi factor was incorrect. The Phi value defaulted to 0.6 and the correct value is 0.75. The user has no option to change this value. Keywords: ACI349–06 GUI Access: Result tab, Check beams, Shear and Torsion (after selecting ACI349–06 as the concrete code used). Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Does not apply. Comments: Does not apply 29/11/2016 X Author Sig... |
| 📄SD2016012_D-02039.pdf | Description of Error: Equivalent nodal load calculation for a load on a curve might be wrong calculated in the unlikely case of two consecutive nodes having equal load but opposite sign in the projection of one axis of the element coordinate system. Keywords: GUI Access: [Load Group] –> Linear load Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Comments: Load has to be exactly the same value with opposite sign in the projection of one axis and nonzero in other axis, so It is very unli... |
| 📄SD2016011_D-02035.pdf | Description of the Error: Combined hardening does not have pure isotropic behaviour when hardening paremeter is equal to zero Keywords: Structural steel, reinforcement steel, prestressing steel, hardening, non–linear analysis. GUI Access: Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Select isotropic hardening type. Comments: 24/11/2016 X Author Signature Firmado por: José Luis Gómez 24/11/2016 X Development Manager Approval Firmado por: José M. Moreno X Reviewed by QA Manager Firmad... |
| 📄SD2016009_D-02023.pdf | Description of Error: Any change in bending reinforcement groups from copied cross section are not taken into account in bending checking/design Keywords: Concrete ,Cross Section , Bending Reinforcement , Checking/Design GUI Access: Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Once the cross section has been copied and modified, save and load the database file (*.xcf or *.cf). Comments: X Corrected by Firmado por: José Luis Gómez X Approval Firmado por: José M. Moreno 18/11/2016 18/... |
| 📄SD2016008_D-01970.pdf | Description of Error: Concrete time–dependent properties are not evaluated correctly in transient analysis. Elastic modulus of concrete for 28 days is always used regardless of the age of material. Keywords: GUI Access: Transient Analysis: [Load case]–>Calendar time /[Concrete Material]–> Activation time Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Comments: This error occurs in transient analysis using concrete material with age different from 28 days. X Corrected by Firmado por: J... |
| 📄SD2016007_D-01964.pdf | Description of Error: Changes of the load factors of a load case created by copy might be ignored. This error occurs if the load factor change is made after solving or drawing this load case on mesh. Keywords: GUI Access: [Load Case] –> Copy Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Comments: This error is fixed when the model is saved and loaded. X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: José M. Moreno 08/09/2016 14/09/2016 X Reviewed by Firmado por: José ... |
| 📄SD2016006_D-01955.pdf | Description of Error: Time history plot of element results (stresses, strains...) ignores the integration point selected and returns results of first integration point. Keywords: GUI Access: Results –> History results Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Comments: This error applies only in element results. Time history plot for node and end results works properly. X Corrected by Firmado por: Javier Carro X Approval Firmado por: José M. Moreno 08/09/2016 14/09/2016 X Reviewe... |
| 📄SD2016005_D-01807.pdf | Description of Error: There was a wrong conversion of the angular units in this specific situation: first, creating a parameter with a vector formula in cylindrical or spherical coordinate systems, and then, changing the angular unit of the model from radians to degrees or vice versa. Keywords: formula, angular, cylindrical, spherical, coordinate system, radians, degrees. GUI Access: Parameter List and Model Units. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Do not change the angul... |
| 📄SD2016004_D-01934.pdf | Description of the Error: Performing a Bending check using the AASHTO 12 will lead to wrong results if the section is of Box type, in the case of Web Local Buckling. Keywords: AASHTO 12, WLB, Box, Bending GUI Access: N/A Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Comments: 21/07/2016 X Author Signature Firmado por: Javier Marcelo Mora 22/07/2016 X Development Manager Approval Firmado por: José M. Moreno X Reviewed by QA Manager Firmado por: Hugo González 21/07/2016 |
| 📄SD2016003_D-01926.pdf | Description of the Error: The coefficient depending on the type of cement (S) is defined improperly according to EHE 08. S values defined in CivilFEM powered by Marc: o Normal hardening cements: 0.43 o Rapid hardening cements 0.30 S values according to EHE 2008 code: o Slow hardening cements : 0.38 o Normal hardening cements:0.25 o Rapid hardening cements:0.2 Consequently, some EHE code properties are wrongly calculated, therefore, checking and analysis results could be affected. This bug only... |
| 📄SD2016002_D-01263.pdf | Description of Error: The result value of the KLT (KZY according to EC3) parameter corresponding to bending and compression buckling check, according to EC3 2005 and Indian Standard 800 Codes, is not calculated correctly. Keywords: EC3, IS800 GUI Access: Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Comments: The result only is affected for members susceptible to torsional deformations. The correct values are obtained by applying the following formulas: Section Class 3,4 Section Clas... |
| 📄SD2016001_D-01871.pdf | Description of Error: When spring forces are listed, CivilFEM computes wrongly the value of the nodal spring forces in the case of non–linear spring stiffness applied on surfaces or lines. Keywords: GUI Access: [Linear/Surface spring] –> Spring forces. Suggested User Action For Running on Uncorrected Version: Comments: The force that CivilFEM compute for the nodal springs is not taking into account the area/length corresponding to each spring. Results files are not affected, so result files gene... |